Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Vaccine at Birth to Helpless Infants

Why Are We Giving Vaccine at Birth to Helpless Infants?
Some Hepatitis B Vaccines Still Have Mercury!!

The only possible justification is to prevent the transmission from an infected mother to her child but this is easier and less expensive to do by screening mothers and giving those at risk the vaccine. They are screening all mothers already for a variety of conditions, why can’t we add another one?
Instead of using common sense we are mandating this vaccine to ALL children. In the hope that when they get older and actually have the opportunity to engage in risky behaviors that they will be protected.
Well guess what?
In over half the kids the immune protection lasts less than seven years which is well before these kids will need any possible benefits of the vaccine.

Aside from the question of whether or not it is appropirate to give infants this vaccine, today, over 8 years after federal agencies advised vaccine manufacturers to remove mercury from their vaccines, some still contain them.

ActHIB, HibTITER in single-dose vials, and PedvaxHIB do not contain thimerosal as a preservative. However, PRP-T (ActHIB) reconstituted with DTaP (Tripedia) to form TriHIBit STILL contain organic mercury.
Does This Make ANY Sense???

Physicians Are Harming 4,000 Children to Protect One From Hepatitis B Complications
Even if a child does become infected with hepatitis B what is the problem? Just how serious is it? Will they die just as surely as if they came down with pancreatic cancer?
Hardly.
The numbers speak for themselves. Only one in 100 who get this infection will run the risk of ANY serious illness.

So just how serious is an infection with Hepatitis B?

Hepatitis B is a rare, mainly blood-transmitted disease.
Far less than 100 children under the age of 1 become infected with hepatitis B. Since there are about 4 million children born in the US every year this works out to about one child in every 200 births that develop hepatitis B. As you will see below this number is actually far lower as only 1% of these children develop serious complications or about 4 or 5 kids.
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reported over 2,000 total reports of adverse reactions from hepatitis B vaccine in the 0-1 age group, with over 50 deaths reported. Here is the kicker, it is well recognized that this is only about 10% of the actual cases. So if you multiply this by 10 you have 20,000 injured infants from the vaccine.
So as a result of all these immunizations physicians are harming 20,000 infants to protect 5 from serious problems.

Why Is This Being Done??
Simple answer - - Money and Greed
Merck is the company that makes the hepatitis B vaccine. Remember Merck? They are the ones that are defending thousands of lawsuits for killing over 60,000 people for Vioxx. They are earning a cool $1 billion dollars per year from selling this vaccine.
Guess you have to pay those Vioxx lawsuits some way.

Some Physicians Understand the Truth

There are many independent physicians who share this belief. There is also an Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). This is a group of over 10,000 US medical doctors (MDs and DOs), and most of them have reached the conclusion that the head of the organization, Dr. Jane Orient, has about this issue.
To the extent that the physician simply complies without making an independent evaluation of the appropriateness of the vaccine for each patient, he is abdicating his responsibility under the Oath of Hippocrates to:
"prescribe regimen for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone." .
AAPS opposes federal mandates for vaccines, on principle, on the grounds that they are:
An unconstitutional expansion of the power of the federal government.
An unconstitutional delegation of power to a public-private partnership.
An unconstitutional and destructive intrusion into the patient-physician and parent-child relationships.
A violation of the Nuremberg Code in that they force individuals to have medical treatment against their will, or to participate in the functional equivalent of a vast experiment without fully informed consent.
A violation of rights to free speech and to the practice of one's religion (which may require one to keep oaths).
AAPS would specifically oppose the campaign for universal immunization against hepatitis B, even if the above did not apply, because the safety of the vaccine is in question.

No comments:

About Me

Abunda Life partner. Detox America Sauna, Dr. Sorge